When we’ve talked to neighbors about Measure H, we’ve noticed that some of the most strongly held opposition arguments are based on confusions about what the measure actually is. The opposition has legitimate concerns about the dollar amount, the cumulative tax burden, and the structural deficit — those are addressed elsewhere on this site. But several of the things people think Measure H does, it doesn’t do.

Here are five of those, with the actual ballot text in each case.

1. It’s not a bond

A general obligation bond is borrowed money — the district sells bonds, takes the proceeds upfront for capital projects (new buildings, renovations), and pays back the bondholders over 30 years through ad valorem property taxes (a percentage of your assessed property value). Larkspur-Corte Madera’s Measure D is a bond. Sausalito Marin City’s Measure I is a bond.

A parcel tax is annual operating revenue — a flat amount per taxable parcel, charged each year, used to pay current operating expenses (salaries, programs, supplies). Measure H is a parcel tax.

Why this matters:

• Bonds fund construction; parcel taxes fund operations. Measure H money cannot be used to build new schools, renovate facilities, or fund capital projects. It’s restricted to teacher retention, class size, and STEM/reading/writing programs.^[1]
• Bonds are taxed by property value; parcel taxes are flat. Measure H is the same $1,282 for a $600K bungalow as for a $4M Victorian. Some people see this as regressive; others see it as a feature (predictable, not subject to assessed-value swings).
• Bonds last 30 years; this parcel tax lasts 10 years. Measure H sunsets June 30, 2036. After that, RVSD has to come back to voters again.

The “not a bond” distinction matters because some opponents have argued “I’m tired of voting on bond measures.” Measure H isn’t on that list.

2. It doesn’t fund construction or capital projects

Following from #1: Measure H money is legally restricted to operating expenses. The ballot text authorizes spending only on:^[1]

1. Attracting and retaining highly qualified teachers
2. Maintaining science, technology, engineering, math, reading and writing programs
3. Maintaining manageable class sizes

If RVSD wanted to renovate a school building or construct a new facility, that would require a bond measure — a separate ballot item that would have its own approval process and 55% threshold. Measure H money cannot legally be used for that purpose.

If you’ve been worried that Measure H is a workaround for an unstated capital project, it isn’t. The legal restrictions in the measure text would make that unlawful.

3. It doesn’t apply directly to renters

This is one of the most common misunderstandings. Renters do not pay the parcel tax directly. The parcel tax is a property tax — it’s billed to the property owner, who is responsible for paying it.

What renters do face is the indirect effect of property taxes flowing through to rents. Landlords typically pass through some portion of property-tax increases to tenants over time, especially in markets with limited rent regulation. So while a renter doesn’t see the $1,282 line item on a tax bill, the tax does affect the rental market in aggregate.

Two practical points:

• If you rent in San Anselmo or Fairfax, you can vote on Measure H — the vote is by registered voters in the district, not by property owners.
• If you’re a landlord and the renter pays property taxes through their lease, then they pay this one too. (This is unusual in residential leases but more common in commercial leases.)

The “Measure H is a tax on renters” framing isn’t quite right — it’s a tax on property owners that has indirect rental-market effects. The direct payer is the parcel owner.

4. It doesn’t pay administrators or pensions

We’ve covered this in our post on where the money goes and our post on independent oversight, but the short version: the ballot text explicitly bars Measure H funds from administrator salaries and from pensions.^[1]

This is a legal restriction, not a campaign promise. A spending decision that violated it would be challengeable in court, and the independent citizens’ oversight committee — required by the measure — reviews expenditures annually in public.

The fungibility critique (general-fund money still pays administrators, so new parcel-tax money for teachers indirectly subsidizes administrator pay) is a more sophisticated version of this argument, and we engage with it on the where-the-money-goes post and the independent-oversight post. The short version: California public-pension structure is set by CalSTRS and CalPERS, not by RVSD’s local board, so “reform pensions before approving more parcel-tax money” isn’t actually within the district’s authority to deliver. RVSD pay is among the lowest in Marin already; the issue is undercompensation, not overcompensation.

5. It doesn’t extend forever

Measure H has a defined term: it takes effect July 1, 2026 and sunsets June 30, 2036.^[1] That’s a 10-year measure. After 10 years, the tax expires unless voters approve a successor measure.

This isn’t unusual — most California parcel-tax measures have a defined term. A 10-year term is the median for Marin school parcel taxes (Mill Valley uses 8 years, Kentfield uses 10 years, Reed Union uses 10 years, the previous RVSD Measure E in 2018 used 10 years).^[2]

What this means for the long-term commitment: if RVSD’s structural funding situation changes by 2036 — through state-level LCFF reform, through demographic shifts, or through other policy changes — the measure simply expires and voters decide what to do next. The 10-year term is a check on the district, not a commitment in perpetuity.

Bonus: it doesn’t replace state funding, it supplements it

A subtler misreading is that the parcel tax substitutes for state funding RVSD should be getting. It doesn’t, and Sacramento doesn’t reduce state aid because a district levies a parcel tax.

LCFF base, supplemental, and concentration grants are calculated independently of local parcel-tax revenue. The parcel tax is additive — it’s the local supplement on top of whatever the LCFF formula produces. RVSD doesn’t lose state funding by raising local parcel taxes.

This matters because some opponents have framed the parcel tax as Sacramento’s way of pushing the funding burden onto local taxpayers. The truth is closer to: Sacramento’s LCFF formula leaves districts like RVSD at the floor by design, and parcel taxes are the only available local lever to compensate. (We walk through this on our LCFF post.)

Our read

The opposition has real arguments. The dollar amount is a real argument. The cumulative tax burden is a real argument. The “come back in November” framing is a real (if structurally weak) argument.

But several common opposition framings are based on misreadings of the actual measure. The measure isn’t a bond. It doesn’t fund construction. It doesn’t apply directly to renters. It doesn’t pay administrators or pensions. It doesn’t extend forever.

If you’ve been weighing your vote partly on one of these confusions, the actual ballot text is worth a read.

That’s part of why we recommend a Yes vote on Measure H.

Sources

1. Ballotpedia: Measure H — official ballot text confirming permitted uses (teacher retention, STEM/reading/writing, class size), prohibited uses (administrator salaries, pensions), and the 10-year term ending June 30, 2036.

2. Marin County Office of Education: school-district parcel tax summary (Sept 2025) — comparison of measure terms across Marin districts.

← All posts